Ecommerce Website Solutions For Your Business

Our teeth are a very important section of our body. They are what make most of the foods we enjoy edible. If a tooth is missing, it can problems and making eating difficult and uncomfortable. Thank goodness we can have a dental implant! A dental implant is an artificial tooth or bone which is placed where missing tooth ought to be. Dental implants ought to be performed only by cosmetic dentists, and people certified to complete such procedures.

Fall supply can be an amazing routines in mix with eBay. It is possible to promote a number of merchandise to buyers with no bothering to provide them by alone.The most beneficial China wholesale fall supply suppliers typically ship the merchandise to your customers’ doorstep for you personally.

The economy has traditionally been separated into three sectors. One is the private sector, meaning businesses. The second is the population sector, or government. And the third will be the nonprofit sector.But now some people mention a fourth sector. It represents nonprofit and for-profit organizations working toward goals of social change and environmental activism.

The main role ones would be to identify and analyze the data in different forms on various platforms. This includes the emails and backups which are restorable and retrievable, if these are deleted. The need of such stored facts arises using the occurrence from the huge law suits in the courtroom and it becomes complex in the case of the loss and problems for the facts and then there include the immense possibilities of the dismissal of the case in the absence from the vital evidences and also the defenses. In the contemporary environment, Courts have strictly imposed the obligations to preserve ESI within the litigation supports. Litigation procedures have become around activity , involving the mandatory steps to protect and shield the documents in various form. These documents are precised because the legal evidences to multiple lawsuits problem. Such obligations are pertinent to folks, employees and businesses plus it is likely to safeguard the documents from the employees which can be taken as effective tool in handling potential risk of susceptible litigations. wieczór panieński.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sessions We Need To Know

Are those Democrats and liberals illiterate or ignorant? The answer is sure. They are immoral.

They are immoral since they always take text out of context. They did it all the way throughout the campaign to demonize Trump. They did it again since Trump was elected and took the White House. The latest case that exemplified their lack of morality was their accusation at Sessions in an irrelevant setting.

This is what happened:

At the January 10th Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, Senator Al Franken (D-Mn) and Jeff Sessions, had the following conversation.

FRANKEN: Okay. CNN has just published a story, and I’m telling you this about a news story that’s just been published. I’m not expecting you to know whether or not it’s true or not. But CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that, quote, “Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” These documents also allegedly say, quote, “There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump’s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.”
Now, again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so you know. But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

SESSIONS: Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.

Please note that Senator Franken clearly defined the context in referring to the CNN report and the allegation that “There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump’s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Senator Sessions also answered the question within the same context as he particularly mentioned he did not have communications with the Russians as a surrogate at a time or two in the Trump campaign.

Sessions was also asked about contact with the Russians in a questionnaire from Senator Pat Leahy (D-Vt).

The questionnaire reads, “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after Election Day?”

Sessions replied simply, “No”.

The context for the questionnaire was also defined as the contact “about the 2016 election”.

Out of the context, the media discovered that Sessions twice had contact with Russia’s ambassador to the United States. Then Democrats and liberals accused Sessions of lying under oath for not disclosing his encounters with envoys from Russia.

According to the Justice Department, then-Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) spoke twice last year with Russia’s ambassador to the United States. One was a visit in September in his capacity as a senator, similar to meetings with envoys from Britain, China, Germany and other nations.

The other occurred in a group setting following a Heritage Foundation speech that Sessions gave during the Republican National Convention, when several ambassadors — including the Russian — approached him after the talk as he was leaving the stage.

Now the Democrats and liberals are taking the encounters between Sessions and Russian ambassador out of context from Sessions’ senator activities that were non-election matters and put them in the context of communications about the election.

Now that we see Attorney General Sessions in his integrity, we have also seen those sessions in the past 2 days that reveals some illiterate, ignorant, and immoral faces: liberal media, Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo), Senator Charles Ellis “Chuck” Schumer (D-Ny), Representative Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi (D-Ca). They accused Sessions of lying. It turned out they were undeniably lying.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Relay For Trump: Marching To Victory!

CAFT Movement today launched “Relay For Trump: Marching To Victory!”.  It is 100 days fron November 8th, 2016 Presidential Election.  We invite all Trump supporters to join the relay and reach as many people as possible to spread the words about Hillary and Trump so people can make their choice.  This is the fight between American people and the establishments plus the mainstream media. You may download the word or PDF document in the following link to forward to the people,  through mail, email,  flyer,  social media. You may edit for your own situation.  Thank you!

Relay For Trump PDF Or Relay For Trump Word Doc

Vote Trump/Pence PDF

Your Action Matters And Is Appreciated!

Trump runs for us, the American people.
Now it’s our turn to Relay for Trump! Relay for America!

Trump’s voice is the voice of American people
American people relay to spread the words out

The 2016 Presidential Election is not Trump vs. Hillary Clinton
It is the American people vs. the rigged system
It’s the mass vs. mass media.

Hillary has the big-donor money behind her
Trump has us, the American people, behind him

Hillary is ignorant, incompetent, and immoral
She runs for herself, for fame and money.

Trump is compassionate, courageous, and capable
He runs for our country and for the American people
Best of all he has the vision to Make America Great Again!

(For details refer to the next Facts page.)

Please join this relay if you believe in Trump. You may relay by mail, email, flyer, phone, or social network. Simply forward this message to any people you may reach in any way. Reach 1,10, 100, or more people. Any number counts.
This is a grass-root movement. Together, we will make history!
Speak out! Go out! Vote Trump November 8th,2016

If you need help regarding the relay, please contact:



Hillary is IGNORANT. As the head of the State Department, she ignored the strict security rules and procedures to send and receive emails on her private unsecured server. FBI director admitted she broke the law though he recommended no indictment to her. If she were an ordinary employee of the State Department, her security breach would result in the termination of her employment. Now she wants to apply for the job as the President of the United States of America.

Hillary is INCOMPETENT. As the Secretary of the State, Hillary had bad judgements and failed on almost all the major world affairs, resulting in the turmoil of the Middle East and the rise of ISIS. Hillary’s incompetence was fully demonstrated in Benghazi massacre when the Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans died in a brutal terrorist attack. In the Senate hearing, she admitted that the State Department team in Libya asked for more security over 600 times. But she said she didn’t receive any of those requests and blamed her security team for not granting more security—all the while saying she took responsibility for what had happened. Supposing she was telling the truth and was not lying, she was incompetent at least as the Secretary of the State. Being the head of the State Department, she even did not have a communication channel with the State Department team overseas and missed more than 600 requests in a life or death situation.

Hillary is IMMORAL. The 2 achievements Hillary bragged about were killing of bin Laden and her advocates for women’s rights. The death of bin Laden was mostly credited to Obama who take advantage of it to win the 2012 election, regardless of the rising of ISIS. So we only focus on her image as women’s rights advocate. Being a woman’s right advocate, Hillary chose to defend and helped a suspected child rapist walk free in 1975, and in 1980, helped another man accused of child rape get a lighter sentence. Being a woman’s right advocate, Hillary never criticized the Middle East countries where women don’t have rights to vote and human rights are among the worst in the world since she received donations from those countries. Recent leaks of the RNC emails showed how corruptive they are to undermine Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary.

Trump is COMPASSIONATE. In 1984, when commercial airlines refused to fly a 3-year-old boy due to his undiagnosed breathing illness, Trump used his private jet to send the boy from Los Angeles to New York City for medical treatment and saved his life. In 1986, Trump saved a woman (Annabel Hill, 66) the farm that had been in her family for five generations. Trump was a strange to Hill at that time and she said “The only way I can explain it was God touched his heart.”

Trump is COURAGEOUS. When the establishments and mainstream media kidnapped Americans on the moral high ground with political correctness, Trump bravely stood out to say NO to political correctness and speak the truth, without fearing the demonization from the media.

Trump is CAPABLE. In June1986, when New York City’s bungled, six-year effort to renovate the Wollman Ice-Skating Rink in Central Park was $12 million over budget with no end in sight, real-estate tycoon Donald Trump stepped forward to offer to finish the rink by Christmas for free. Trump paid for the entire renovation out of his own pocket, with the understanding that he’d be reimbursed upon completion up to an agreed-upon limit. The finished rink came in at $1.95 million, which was $750,000 below the limit, and it was two months ahead of the schedule.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

On Bill Clinton DNC Speech

It’s unexpected that Bill would spend most of his time describing the love between Hillary and him, as well as their family life. He only mentioned some trivial things regarding Hillary’s political achievements. He didn’t attack Trump much as other speakers did. After Bill Clinton’s speech, it was easy to get his message:

If you believe in the love between Hillary and Bill, you can believe that Hillary can be a good President of the United States.

Bill Clinton seemed never want his wife to win the election.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment


Who categorized Trump suppoters as white, poorly educated males? Look at the the Chinese Americans For Trump Movement. They are not white. They are well educated. Many of them are women.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Why I am not voting for Hillary

I am Asian, woman, well educated, with a pretty good job and pay.  i am not going to vote for Hillary.  Here is why:

There are so many reasons not to vote for Hillary.  During her decades-long political career, there are too few achievements yet too many scandals. Let us just look at a few major ones.

  1. Private Email Server Scandal (AKA EmailGate). In March 2015, it became publicly known that Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as United States Secretary of State, had exclusively used her family’s private email server for official communications, rather than official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. Those official communications included emails originally marked as classified with thousands of emails that would later be marked classified by the State Department retroactively.

WikiLeaks, an organization created to publish classified information, made major waves in March when it published a searchable archive of Clinton’s emails.  This organization’s upcoming leak of more Hillary Clinton emails should be enough to indict her. It is also reported that the FBI, although having been quiet on the scandal, is about to indict Hillary soon.

If just one thousandth of what Hillary did happened to another person, that person would have already been in prison serving sentences.  Why is it possible for Hillary Clinton to continue to run for the President of the United States while being under investigation and possible Indictment?  It can only happen in a Democrat-controlled Obama Presidency.

2) Bangazi Scandal. On September 11, 2012, Islamist militants ambassador and three other Americans. White House officials initially, and inaccurately, described the assault not as a coordinated terrorist attack, but as a spontaneous act of violence born out of a protest over an anti-Islamic video. It later emerged that the state department, led at the time by Hillary Clinton, had rejected appeals of more than 600 times for additional security at the consulate where the attack took place.  S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was the first U.S. Ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979. For details on what happened to the consulate and the victims, please purchase DVD of the movie “13 Hours”.

Do you still remember that famous 3-AM Ad Hillary put out in her 2008 primary?  Obviously “Benghazi was a 3 a.m. phone call that she never picked up” (Rand Paul).  She lied to the relatives of the victims, to the American people, to the world about the cause of the attack and how she handled the crisis.  If she does not care about her ambassador, do you think she is going to care about you and me?  I would not trust her to be my protector since she has no willingness and capability to protect us.

3) Foreign Political Donations.  Over the years, the Clinton Foundation has accepted $16 million to $40 million from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar.  The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, alone, has given the Clinton Foundation an unspecified amount between $10 million and $25 million.  Saudi Arabia also funded 20% Of Hillary’s Presidential Campaign.

Do you think Hillary will stand up and fight for you while this country is facing increasing attacks from radical Islamic terrorists?  With so much cash in her pocket from her Islamic donors, who do you think she is going to betray:  her Islamic masters, or you and the American People?   The answer is obvious:  she has no choice but to give up and betray the American People, and blame the guns for all the attacks.

4) Persecution of women.  Hillary has been trying to play the “Woman Card” since she started to run for the president.  She claims to fight for women on benefits, welfare, equal pay and other empty promises.   But what is her track record on helping and protecting women?  Back in 1975, the young Hillary “volunteered” to represent a 42-year-old man named Tom Taylor who was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. Hillary told the judge in the case that the complainant “made up the rape story because she enjoyed fantasizing about older men.  Hillary Clinton got the rapist freed, but later admitted in an interview that she knew the defendant was guilty and laughed about the outcome of the case.

Over the years, Bill Clinton has repeatedly raped, assaulted dozens of woman.  Hillary Clinton now claims that “every survivor of sexual assault…You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We’re with you.”  Yet, she not only refused to believe, but actively participated in campaigns to discredit them and destroy their reputations: Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky and the list goes on and on.

Hillary Clinton has long positioned herself as a champion of equal pay for women. Ironically, during her time in the U.S. Senate, between 2002 and 2008, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men.  The median annual salary for female staffers was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for men.

Hillary can put up beautiful slogan, appealing promises, but the records speak louder:  she cares about no other woman but herself.  Women voters, is she going to fight for you?  You make the call.

5) Outrageous speech fees and corporate donation.  Hillary Clinton says she and Bill were ‘dead broke’ when they left White House, largely due to costs related to Bill Clinton’s rape cases. But by 2016, the Clintons have an estimate family net worth of more than $110 million.  Hillary and Bill Clinton combined to earn more than $153 million in paid speeches from 2001 until spring of 2015.  In total, the two gave 729 speeches from February 2001 until May 2015, receiving an average payday of $210,795 for each address. The two also reported at least $7.7 million for at least 39 speeches to big banks, including Goldman Sachs and UBS, with Hillary Clinton collecting at least $1.8 million for at least eight speeches to big banks.

Why do you think the big corporations, many of them big Wall Street banks, are willing to pay such a hefty fee to listen to her for 30 minutes?  They are paying for policy influences, so they can freely move their factories to China, Mexico, Japan, India and Ireland; so they can leave more than $2 trillion outside of the country to avoid taxes, leaving American workers unemployed permanently and making the wages of American workers stagnant for years.  Hillary is only interested in making money for her family, not yours.

6) A greedy family. After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House china, furniture and artwork that she had stolen.  Her daughter, Chelsea Clinton was paid $600,000 a year for a part-time stint as “special correspondent” for NBC News from 2011-2014. Her son-in-law’s hedge fund lost $25 million of investors’ money, and he just stepped away without any legal consequences.

Is this the first family you would like to put back to White House?  I would not entrust them to manage my personal money, let alone this great country.

7) Few achievements. From first lady of the state of Arkansas, to first lady of the United States, to the Senator of New York State, then to Secretory of State, how many achievements has Hillary achieved?  It is really hard to just name a few of them.  The only ones that listed by Democrats are remotely related to the betterment of the US economy, military, and political.  Yet, we can easily list numerous poor decisions and deals she was involved:  she agrees to the invasion of Iraq, she is the mastermind of the 2011 Arab Spring, she create the vacuum environment for ISIS to grow and spread to Europe and America,  she leaves Syria in civil war to force millions of refugees leave homes and die on roads,……

Will you still vote for her when you look at her resume and list of “achievements”?

8) Left-wing Supreme Court Justice.  In June 2015, the Supreme Court ruled to make same-sex marriage a legal right nationwide.  In May 2016, the Obama administration issued guidance directing public schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms matching their gender identity. In February 2016, the most conservative long-term justice, Antonin Scalia, died in a sudden accident. Before his death, the SCOTUS was 5 conservative to 4 liberal.  Justices Scalia’s death leaves the SCOTUS at a balance 4-4 situation.  If Hillary is elected president, she will have chances to name more than one left-wing justice, since many of the justices are either very old or may retire.  Do you want your daughters’ privacy to be invaded in the restroom by someone who claims to be a woman, but is still man biologically?  It is hard to image what left-wing agenda would be passed if Hillary is elected.  We must keep the conservativeness of the Supreme Court.  The SCOTUS is simply the most important and long lasting issue related to the future of this country.  This reason alone should convince you not to vote for the most far left candidate in the history of the United States, Hillary Clinton.

9)  Islamic Refugees and ISIS.   Hillary plans to accept 65,000 Islamic refugees, a more than 500% increase then her initial plan of 10,000.  She plans to do so without the FBI having proper ways of vetting.  Among the refugees, we see thousands of thousands of young, strong man, who leave their parents, wives, and children back home.  ISIS already claims to have smuggled thousands of extremists into Europe and the US.  In the past 6 months alone, we have had 2 radical Islamic terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando.  Hillary’s refugee policy is putting American people’s lives in jeopardy.  We do not need another terrorist attack in our neighborhood.  We do not need Hillary to take in thousands of thousands of refugees, before the FBI can find a way to properly vet them.

10) Illegal immigrants:  Hillary is pro-amnesty.  She says illegal immigrants should be eligible for Obamacare.  She pledges not to deport any illegal immigrants.  She even apologized for saying ‘illegal immigrants’.  Do we still have a country?  Do we have immigration laws?  If so, why as a presidential candidate, she refuses to follow the law?  Because if she can find a way to legalized these illegal immigrants, the democrat party, already, and will continue to load them onto the US welfare system, these people will permanently become the voting base for Democrat Party, together with increasingly impoverished African American and Latino voters.  By then the two-party system that exists today will evolve to a one-party system, only the Democrat Party.  We should never let that happen to the United States.  Hillary Clinton cannot be elected as the next president of the United States.

The 2016 election is the most important election in modern US history.  We are now at a critical crossroads.  Do we want to continue the prosperity that has been blessed by our founding fathers?  Or do we want to become another third-world country with no social impact?  Your vote on November 8, 2016 can be the single most important vote you would ever cast in your lifetime.  American people and the great country of the United States need you to make a clear decision:  not to vote for Hillary.  Your only choice is the Republican nominee Donald J. Trump.  He is going to Make America Great and Safe Again!


Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

ISIS’ Plot To Conquer The World

In 1989, Zarqawi traveled to Afghanistan to join the insurgency against the Soviet invasion, but the Soviets were already leaving by the time he arrived. He met and befriended Osama bin Laden while there. After  the Soviet War in Afghanistan, Zarqawi returned to Jordan where he was arrested and sentenced to prison in 1993 for possession of guns and explosives in his home. He was released in 1999 amnesty.

According to Jordanian and European intelligence agencies, Zarqawi formed a group with $200,000 of start-up money from Osama bin Laden. The group originally consisted of 150 members and was known as “The Organization of Monotheism and Jihad”. It was believed to be the beginning of the group which later became Islamic State.

After 911 which resulted in the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in October, 2001, Zarqawi returned to Afghanistan to help Taliban and al-Qaida fighters. He then was injured before he fled to Iran and Iraq for medical treatments.

In March, 2003, U.S. invaded Iraq. Zarqawi and his group were the most active insurgents and were responsible for dozens of violent and deadly attacks in Iraq. In October 2004 Zarqawi’s group officially pledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network, changing its name known as “al-Qaeda in Iraq” (AGI).

In January 2006, AGI joined other Sunni insurgent groups to form the short-lived Mujahideen Shura Council (MSC). After Zarqawi was killed in June 2006, MSC merged in October 2006 with several more insurgent factions to establish Islamic State of Iraq (ISI). The ISI was led by Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and Abu Ayyub al-Masri, until they were killed in a US–Iraqi operation in April 2010, after which Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became the group’s leader (This is Baghdadi referenced later in this article).

Unlike Zarqawi, Baghdadi is native to Iraq. He had never been influenced by bin Laden. On the contrary, Baghdadi differed dramatically with bin Laden, both in ideology and in methodology. Baghdadi had far greater ambition than bin Laden. He would resort to any means for his objectives, even torturing fellow Muslims and targeting al-Qaeda group later in Syria.

According to a study compiled by United States intelligence agencies in early 2007, the ISI planned to seize power in the central and western areas of Iraq and turn it into a Sunni caliphate. The group built in strength and at its height enjoyed a significant presence in the Iraqi governorates of Al Anbar, Diyala and Baghdad, claiming Baqubah as a capital city.

The ISI plan was subdued by the U.S.-led coalition and Iraq security forces. In 2007 the U.S. troop peaked at more than 170,000 which supplied the military with more manpower for operations targeting ISI, resulting in dozens of high-level ISI members being captured or killed.

Between July and October 2007, ISI lost its secure military bases in Al Anbar province and the Baghdad area. During 2008, a series of US and Iraqi offensives managed to drive out ISI-aligned insurgents from their former safe havens, such as the Diyala and Al Anbar governorates, to the area of the northern city of Mosul. ISI was describing itself as being in a state of “extraordinary crisis” in 2008.

Back in the U.S. Obama emerged as the front-runner for president in Democratic Party primary. In mid-2008, Obama pushed aggressively for a swift U.S. pullout and publicly undermined Bush – who was trying to keep troops there with no strict timetable for withdrawal – by colluding with the loathsome Iraq Prime Minister Maliki toward that end. With Obama about to visit Iraq and already heavily favored to win the presidency, Maliki openly endorsed Obama’s call for a complete American pullout within 16 months of Obama’s taking office, as the New York Times reported on July 21, 2008.

Under the pressure from domestic opponents as well as from Iraq government headed by Maliki, Bush signed the U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq during his fourth and final trip to Iraq in December, 2008, one month before he left his White House office. The agreement included a specific date, June 30th, 2009, by which American forces should withdraw from Iraqi cities, and a complete withdrawal date from Iraqi territory by December 31st, 2011.

Once in office, Obama adjusted the withdrawal schedule in February 2009, by setting August 31st, 2010 as the date to withdraw all combat brigades to fulfill his promise to bring combat forces home within 16 months after taking the office.  Meanwhile he kept American brigades in place with the primary mission to advise Iraqi forces instead of fighting the insurgents. Obama was credited for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq and he later was awarded the 2009 Noble Peace prize.

Without being overwhelmed by the U.S. combat forces. ISI resurrected in Iraq and expanded beyond.

In March, 2011, Syria civil war started. Obama, being an inspirational speaker, still chose talk over action as he would in the earlier Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia, Lybia and Egypt. However, he did set a red line which he could not uphold later regarding the use of chemical weapons. This sparked corrosive cynicism among ordinary Arabs. The gap between Obama rhetoric and policy reality was so huge that left enough room to breed enemy overconfidence.

On May 2nd, 2011, bin Laden was killed by U.S. Navy Seals in a raid to his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. NBC News reported that a retired Pakistani military intelligence officer helped the CIA track bin Laden down.

According to documents and letters seized from the raid, bin Laden had been warned for years about Baghdadi’s intention to break tie with al-Qaeda to be an independent state, though he chose not to believe it out of his self-esteem.

Down was bin Laden and rising was Baghdadi.  In August, 2011, Baghdadi began sending Syrian and Iraqi ISI members experienced in guerrilla warfare across the border into Syria to establish an organization there, recruiting fighters and establishing cells throughout the country.

As Obama proudly declared on October 21st, 2011, “After nearly 9 years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.” The U.S. completed withdrawing troops from Iraq when the last 500 soldiers left Iraq on the morning of December 18th, 2011.

In July 2012, Baghdadi released an audio statement online announcing that the group was returning to former strongholds from which US troops and the Iraq security forces had driven them in 2007 and 2008. He also declared the start of a new offensive in Iraq called Breaking the Walls, aimed at freeing members of the group held in Iraqi prisons.

In April 2013, having expanded into Syria, Baghdadi renamed his group, known as “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria” (abbreviated as ISIS), or as Obama administration preferred, “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (abbreviated as ISIL, and Levent is a historical geographical term referring to a large area in the eastern Mediterranean which includes Isreal and Egypt).

As the Syria war continued, refugees fled attacks by Syrian government and ISIS, to surrounding Arab countries. On September 20th, 2013, Sweden offered permanent residency to Syrian refugees. Other European countries followed for humanitarian considerations. This brought light to the refugees and enlightened Baghdadi and his followers who came up with a bright idea.

On 29 June 2014, ISIS announced the establishment of a worldwide caliphate and claimed to erase all state borders. Baghdadi was named its caliph, to be known as “Caliph Ibrahim”, and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant was renamed the Islamic State (IS). The announcement was followed by a roughly 20-minute audio from the “Caliph” himself, in which he pledged to conquer Rome, inaugurated a “new era” and invited jihadists to take up arms and fight with Islamic State.

The next day the United Nations declares that an estimated 1.2 million Iraqis have fled their homes.

The declaration of the caliphate was heavily criticized by Middle Eastern governments, other jihadist groups, and Sunni Muslim theologians and historians. Qatar-based TV broadcaster and theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi stated: “[The] declaration issued by the Islamic State is void under sharia and has dangerous consequences for the Sunnis in Iraq and for the revolt in Syria”, adding that the title of caliph can “only be given by the entire Muslim nation”, not by a single group.

Since Baghdadi explicitly pledged to conquer Rome even if Rome in this context was just a symbolic name for the Western world, Italian government did not want the refugees to stay in Italy. They just tried to let them go. As a result, Italian officials turned a blind eye to the refugees fleeing the country for Northern Europe. Even the refugees themselves were worried that anyone could be traveling in their midst — even terrorists with the Islamic State.

As Muhammad, a 32 year old Syria refugee, told Foreign Policy reporter, after arriving Italy by sea with hundreds of other migrants from Syria he was surprised to see that the Italian authorities took little interest in who the migrants were, or where they intended to go.

“Nobody checked us upon reaching Italy,” he says. “No coast guard, no policeman ever asked if we had papers. Nobody registered us, nobody took a photo of us, nobody took our fingerprints, no one asked us who we were.”

“Any ISIS terrorist could have entered Italy and traveled further into Europe without any problem,” he said. “ISIS members can take their guns and hand grenades with them, because the Italians even never checked any of the luggage.” Muhammad was deeply concerned.

The destination of most of the migrants was Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel pledged to accept more than 1 million refugees in 2015. Next to Germany was Sweden that accepted nearly 200,000 refugees in 2015.

The resettlement of refugees in European countries were backfired by their citizens, fearing that terrorist groups like IS may take advantage of the refugee resettlement program and infiltrate into Europe.

On September 14th, 2015, UK news media Mirror reported that Lebanese Education Minister Elias Bou Saab warned that at least 20,000 bloodthirsty jihadists had infiltrated Syrian refugee camps and were plotting to enter Europe, through a covert jihadi “operation”. His warning came as David Cameron made a whistle-stop tour of refugee camps in Lebanon and Jordan to try to win back public support on the Syria crisis.

Daily Express reported in November 2015 that an opearative working for Islamic State revealed the terror group had successfully smuggled thousands of covert jihadists into Europe.

In North America, Canada’s Liberal government promised to accept 25,000 refugees by end of 2015 and Obama administration offered to resettle 10,000 Syrian refugees in 2016. Hillary Clinton even called to bring 65,000 displaced Syrians into the United States. They made such calls even though polls showed that a clear majority of Americans opposed admitting any Syrians. In November 2015, 47 House Democrats broke with Obama to help overwhelmingly pass a bill that would make admission of Syrian refugees virtually impossible. However, with his executive power, Obama still could order to have hundreds of refugee applications processed each day to bring in Syrians.

Ironically, when Syrian refugees arrived in U.S. under Obama administration’s speed-up “surge” resettlement operation, Obama never showed up to welcome those refugees. The mainstream media also remained silent with refugee entering U.S. This formed a sharp contrast with their overwhelming voices for accepting refugees into this country.

Even though Obama remained low key on entering refugees, he kept high key on touting for accepting more refugees by U.S. and other European countries. During his recent visit to European Union in late April 2016, Obama told his audience in his speech in Hanover, Germany that “People starved on this continent. Families were separated on this continent. And now people desperately want to come here precisely because of what you’ve created. You can’t take that for granted.” Obama sounded like Germany was guilty of everything that resulted in the refugee crisis. Even if Germany opened their warm heart to embrace more than 1 million refugees, the refugees could take it for granted and more refugees should come, as implied by the Obama rhetoric.

Baghdadi knows that the days for IS is numbered. He also knows that the easiest way to conquer a fortress is to attack from within. People with common sense all over the world also could figure out what the intention of Baghdadi and his followers were when they declared worldwide caliphate and erased all its borders, letting go the young and strong males they needed in the fight for their course. Many countries, including Russia, China, Korea, Japan, Singapore, even Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, are smart enough to refuse resettlement for any Syrian refugees in their countries.

Leaders of the European Unions and U.S. stand aloft on moral high ground and could not see the immoral movements underneath. They may simply be ignorant, or they have their own calculations. Time may tell.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Who is a bigot?

On June 16, 2015, one day after Jeb Bush announced his presidential campaign, Donald Trump, a real estate mogul and TV celebrity,  announced his candidacy for President of the United States at theTrump Tower in New York City.  Trump made his campaign slogan clear “Make America Great Again!”  The mainstream media did not take Trump seriously, neither did Jeb Bush.

At that time, Jeb Bush was undoubtedly the front-runner in the GOP race.  Donald Trump was only a joke to him.  When Sean Hannity mentioned the on the day Trump announced his candidacy, Bush just laughed.  Voters watching Bush and Hannity inside the Derry Opera House, in southern New Hampshire, also burst out laughing.

To me, Trump’s campaign was a joke too at that time.  I thought Trump himself was not serious about his campaign.  He might just want to entertain the public and gain some numbers for his TV ratings.  I like being entertained.  I watched the GOP debates.  Sure enough, Trump, as a reality TV star, made the debates fun to watch.  He expressed his campaign ideas while mocking other candidates.  While being entertained, I became serious about him:  “Really, is this Donald Trump?  How he speaks out what I’d like to say.”

More and more American people became serious about Trump after they realized that Trump was speaking for the American citizens, particularly for the working class.  The mass media became serious about Trump too, only in a way different:  they began to attack Trump.  They labeled Trump as a bigot and racist.

Dana Milbank, an opinion writer, wrote on Washington Post on December 1, 2015:

“Let’s not mince words: Donald Trump is a bigot and a racist.

Some will think this an outrageous label to apply to the frontrunner for a major party’s presidential nomination. Ordinarily, I would agree that name-calling is part of what’s wrong with our politics.

But there is a greater imperative not to be silent in the face of demagoguery. Trump in this campaign has gone after African Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians, women, Muslims and now the disabled.”

Wow, that list of people Trump went after definitely include me.  How would I feel otherwise?  Let me wait and see.

Then Dean Obeidallah, a former attorney, the host of SiriusXM’s weekly program “The Dean Obeidallah Show,” a columnist for The Daily Beast and editor of the politics blog The Dean’s Report, said on CNN that “A vote for Trump is a vote for bigotry”.

Shaun King on March 15, 2016 stated on New York Daily News: “If you support Donald Trump at this point in his campaign, you are a bigot and you might as well just admit it.”

I had to ask myself: “Am I a bigot since I am going to support Donald Trump?”  I knew I would not be a racist whatsoever since I could only be a victim of racism.

I am highly educated and could brag about my perfect scores in standard test on English grammar, vocabulary and reading comprehension.  At least when I was in doubt about a word, I could look it up from dictionary.  When bombarded by the media propaganda, I was really confused about who is a bigot and if I could be a bigot without awareness.  Fortunately I have dictionary to look up.

From Oxford Dictionary, a bigot is “A person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.”

From Marriam-Webster dictionary, the full definition of bigot is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially :  one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance”

With the definition of bigot in mind, now let’s look at what Trump said and how the media and some people treated Trump’s opinion.

Trump said during his presidential announcement, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.”

In the wake of terrorist attacks worldwide, Trump called for barring all Muslims from entering the United States by a campaign press release that said “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

Those were just Trump’s opinions on how he perceived the illegal immigrants from Mexico and the muslins.  As a candidate for the presidential race, Trump was simply candid about his opinions and he went straight to tell the American people.  It’s the American people who should be the ultimate judge for his opinions.  How could the media be so desperate on Trump’s opinions?  The media tried all the means to influence the voters by demonizing Trump and labeling him a bigot and a racist.

The mass media showed its power.  While Trump’s support skyrocketed, protester chased Trump wherever he went.

In South Carolina the protesters holding up signs saying: “Black Lives Matter”.  When Trump was asked what he would do about the protests and the issue of racially-motivated violence.  In the true Trump fashion, he responded: “There’s no such thing as racism anymore. We’ve had a black president, so it’s not a question anymore. Are they saying black lives should matter more than white lives or Asian lives? If black lives matter, then go back to Africa. We’ll see how much they matter there.”

Again, Trump was candid.  You have your opinions.  I have mine.  If you agree with me, vote for me.  If you don’t agree with me, don’t vote for me.  That’s the democracy.  But things did not go the way as democracy should be.  On March 11th, 2016 in Chicago, with thousands of people already packed into stands and music blaring to warm up the crowd, Trump’s campaign had to abruptly cancel his rally that Friday night over security concerns as protesters clashed with his supporters inside the arena where he was to speak.  Never ever in American history that a presidential candidate was deprived of his right of speech in his rally by the violence from protesters.

Despite the violent protests, more and more people came out to support Trump.  People stood by Trump with their votes when he swept New York and 5 other east and northeast states.  The protesters seemed desperate when they saw it inevitable for Trump to be nominated by the GOP.  When Trump went to California to have a rally in Orange County on April 28th, 2016, a big crowd of 31,000 supporters attended.  Scores of protesters clashed with the police as well as with Trump supporters outside and after the rally.  Police cars were damaged and protesters blocked the way out for Trump supporters.  They shouted bigots and racists to the Trump supporters.  A Trump supporter got punched in the face and bleed as a scuffle broke out in the street.  The next day, demonstrators massed outside Trump’s scheduled speech before the state Republican Party Convention. The protest forced Trump and his entourage to take a roundabout route to get into the event at a Hyatt in Burlingame.  Lines of armed police were confronted by the protesters holding handmade signs and Mexican flags.

Trump made light of the situation at the top of his remarks to the GOP, “Wow. So nice. That was not the easiest entrance I’ve ever made,” Trump said. “We went under a fence and through a fence. Oh, boy. Felt like I was crossing the border, actually. You know? I was crossing the border.”  But the scene outside was again unprecedented: people holding Mexican flag to protest an American presidential candidate for his speech on American land.

With all those media propaganda and violent protesting events, I finally figured out who are the bigots.  American people could also figure out who those bigots are, though people may not say who they are.  In this country, things are such things but you cannot say what they are.  That is political correctness.  Therefore, when mass media and the protesters say that Trump is a bigot and Trump supporters are bigots, we can be sure that is not the case.  When the real bigots are out there, the political correct media would not dare to call them by name.

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Cruz’ journey to find his running mate

Cruz is pathetic,

Asking Kasich to be a team,

Kasich replies coldly, “I have my own Presidential dream”


Next he turns to Rubio,

and senses he wants to be VP.

Rubio says he would love to

But only for a winner, you see.


Having two Cubans as top commanders,

Sounds like Bay of Pigs all over again,

In a full general election,

They would both be thrown in the can.


After two painful rejections,

Cruz turns with his face sad and long.

Fiorina sees his dejection,

And says, “how about a song?”

There there, little baby,

She says in a motherly voice.

I am happy to be your VP,

Even if I am your third choice.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Haiku for protesters

Haiku for protesters



Deny the speaker,

They call it freedom of speech,

Proves that Trump is right.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment